We also use 4948 for routing and Netonix for powering backhauls/APs at 
DC sites.

I'm excited for Netonix's native -48v switch coming out this year. 
Currently doing DCtoDC conversions to get em working.

On 1/16/2017 17:21, John Hendrich wrote:
> Great suggestions.  I'll probably go the Cisco route since I need 
> routing capability (i.e. ospf & static routing) and it doesn't appear 
> as though the Netonix has that.
>
> Thanks again!
> On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 16:49 -0500, Matt Lauer wrote:
>> If you wanted to stick with Cisco, a Cisco 4948 with hot swappable 
>> 48VDC power supplies and you will have 48 1G ports. $300 on ebay. 
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Josh Luthman 
>> <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> 
>> wrote: 
>>
>>     Netonix for real. 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     Josh Luthman
>>     Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2340>
>>     Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:%28937%29%20552-2343>
>>     1100 Wayne St
>>     Suite 1337
>>     Troy, OH 45373 
>>
>>
>>     On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:36 PM, <mike.l...@gmail.com
>>     <mailto:mike.l...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Netonix 
>>
>>
>>         > On Jan 16, 2017, at 13:33, John Hendrich
>>         <john.hendr...@airhop.com <mailto:john.hendr...@airhop.com>>
>>         wrote:
>>         >
>>         > We currently use a Cisco DC powered Layer 3 switch at one
>>         of our remote sites.  The site has an Emerson DC inverter /
>>         battery backup and outputs 48VDC.  We power the Cisco switch
>>         with 48VDC and use "step down" devices to output 24VDC with POE.
>>         >
>>         > What would everyone recommend as a replacement for the
>>         Cisco switch?  If the UBNT switches could be powered by DC,
>>         that would be ideal.  I certainly want Gig ports (which is
>>         why I want to replace the Cisco).
>>         >
>>         > Regards,
>>         > John
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>
>>         > _______________________________________________
>>         > Ubnt_users mailing list
>>         > Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
>>         > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman
>>         
>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users>/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>         <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Ubnt_users mailing list
>>         Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
>>         http://lists.wispa.org/mailman
>>         
>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users>/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>         <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Ubnt_users mailing list
>>     Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
>>     http://lists.wispa.org/
>>     
>> <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users>mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>     <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Matt Lauer
>>
>> Solvaris, Inc.
>>
>>
>> 586.453.0440 p
>>
>> 248.495.3977 c
>>
>> 586.453.0805 f
>>
>>
>> mla...@solvaris.com <mailto:mla...@solvaris.com>
>>
>> www.solvaris.com <http://www.solvaris.com/>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org>
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



_______________________________________________
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Reply via email to