Chris Hayes wrote: > Thanks or the feedback Eric. Is it really this hopeless?
remember what I said about negative filtering. :-) If I had the time I would finish writing up my bit on the mediator and how it would work. I believe it's eminently practical and even a good idea. given enough hands, it's not that hard to complete relatively soon (i.e. under six months). But well, I don't really have that good hands and code always takes me forever and a day to get done because it wears on my throat. > You talked > about the Sphinx projects being okay - but not ready for normal users. > To what extent are they capable? I'd really love to know if you or > anyone else has tried them. I'm sure there are others on the list to have tried and maybe even developed parts of them. I'll let them out themselves. :-) > > I have looked into them but haven't had the time (and not being a very > capable technical user) to get them going, orto get them going nicely. > If I knew how well they worked, I'd probably be more inclined to use the > time I don't have getting them working. your experience as part of the existence proof that they aren't ready for prime time. The two reasons packages don't get used is that it's incomplete/not ready or it has poor PR. I've been guilty of both of my projects :-) ---eric -- Speech-recognition in use. It makes mistakes, I correct some. -- Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility