+1 on issues vs priority.
I am thinking myself that if gnome shell gets a bit more accessible in
next few months and if there is a good talking installer for some other
distro, I will go away from Ubuntu and shift to that distro full time.
Just tryed Sonar and would wait for manjaro to become stable enough for use.
I find gnome shell 3.8 very accessible, except taht there is nothing
like heads up display and the apps when loaded are not announced.
Notifications such as wifi connections connected or disconnected is not
announced.
So, even now I can give 8 out of 10 to gnome shell accessibility and
keeping more hopes on improvements over there rather than Unity.
Happy hacking.
Krishnakant.
Happy hacking.
Krishnakant.
On 10/31/2013 12:49 AM, Nolan Darilek wrote:
On 10/30/2013 11:19 AM, Luke Yelavich wrote:
If there were more resources, more effort could be put into supporting
interim releases. Luke
I agree. It's a shame that Canonical is so focused on replacing GNOME
with Unity, replacing Wayland with Mir, building its own cloud
deployment solution, putting Ubuntu on every device, that it only has a
single developer to spare for access, which is why I've asked for years
what meaningful action can be done about that. Even Android pushes out
accessibility improvements faster than does Ubuntu these days. But there
just doesn't seem like enough interest from Canonical--too busy
pandering to their able-bodied users I suppose--so I'm at a loss.
The issue isn't resources. It's priorities.
--
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility
