On Jun 25, 2006, at 4:31 PM, Troy James Sobotka wrote:
This will require some new language. Basically, Human icons are in and staying -- as per sabdfl. This will be a component of the 'Human Look', which is what we are sticking with (albeit trying to finish it, polish it, and finish the set.)
I don't understand why it is so pertinently important to keep Human in. In all objectivity, it's simply a suboptimal icon set when compared to Tango. I also don't see why any of the arguments that I have given have to be ignored. Like I stated, Human doesn't seem to follow any proper guidelines at all. If it does, then I would like to read their rationale for arbitrarily designing some icons from different angles.
I've got the greatest respect for Mark, but I do not see his rationale. Michiel Sikma [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
