On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > shadowh511 wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:37 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > Didn't I just say something to the same effect? Though I > > wouldn't put in > > the negative connotations in the descriptions. > > > > If they don't make the repo package, they could go on > GNOME-look. > > > > -Cory \m/ > > > > > > yeah, but if the themes are on gnome-look, how is the average user > > supposed to know how to install them? > > > > I think that if the themes are rejected, they get packaged anyway, > > and the user is given instructions on how to use the themes (wiki > > page!!!) > > > > I have been using gnome-look a lot and i still get confused. a > > ubuntu client for gnome-look would be very nice. > > > > Most themes come in a .tar and you simple drop them in the theme > manager. I really don't see why that's hard. In Windows you have to hack > files to get it to use 3rd party themes and tons of people figure it > out. The same people with the drive to them windows are smart enough to > figure it out on linux. Your grandma doesn't change themes. > > > > > by the way, what is mark shuttleworth's email? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > But know, it's just gonna get forwarded to Ken who is already watching > this list. :P > > -Cory \m/ > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >
That was close, I almost top-posted. Ok, thanks for the insight about The God's, I mean Mark Shuttleworth's ideas. -- Ubuntu FTW!
-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
