According to a comment on this blog post<http://www.boingboing.net/2007/11/16/droid-sans-mono-a-sw.html#comment-83140>, the droid fonts are, in fact, not free. So whether they look good or not is beside the point, as they cannot be included due to licensing restrictions.
Smartboy On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Kido Mariano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 23:21 -0400, Cory K. wrote: > > Here's a detailed post about the Droid font. > > > > http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2008/07/why-droid-isnt-answer.html > > > > About this one... > > I'd agree with the first point. :] However, your UI font won't appear as > large paragraphs all the time. As phrases, the font looks nice. IMO it's > better than what we have now. > > The rest of the points aren't quite related to Droid Sans being the UI > font. Droid Serif shouldn't be our main *print* serif font since it's > meant for screen use, too. It's quite easier to read, though, if that > matters. (I think Liberation Serif would be nice for this...) > > > > > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art >
-- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
