On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:57 PM, shadowh511 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 28, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Mario Viviani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Il giorno lun, 28/07/2008 alle 15.23 +0200, Duncan Austin ha scritto: > > New batch, I tried to get everyones ideas in here. The only thing I did > differently from the suggestions was the buttons, the gray background to > them just made it all feel more "solid". > > http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/raraken/kin_piano_kith_r2.png > http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/raraken/kin_piano_clouds_r2.png > http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/raraken/kin_piano_rocks_r2.png > http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/raraken/kin_piano_trnthtfrnupsddwn_r2.png > > aaand... The development SVG. One thing about the SVG is that it's -very- > rough. > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Intrepid/Kin_Intrepid?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=kin_piano_rev2.svg > > > > How about something different for the buttons, since we're being > distinctive? > > Mockup here: > > http://www.readitsideways.com/kin_piano_grass_buttons.png > > Duncan > > > Quite difficult to make them work, but i think it can be done. In Emerald > it's easier than in metacity, so maybe someone can try making a working > candidate for them.. I think they're cool and original, but thinking about > usability i have some doubts... > > Mario > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > Honestly, why is everyone wanting to use emerald? It is as stable as > windows 95! > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art > > I think Compiz Fusion is the culprit - Beryl was so much more stable for me at least.
-- Salane Ashcraft [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art