mac_v wrote: > Cory K. wrote: > >> Just wanted to give everyone a little heads-up. Sebastien and I have >> each had some personal things to deal with over the past two weeks so it >> has made things slow up a bit on Breathe. Rest assured, we still have a >> plan. ;) >> > > Just to mention a few things , > -Sebastiens upload today > the mp3 icon doesnt have a shadow, while the > other have shadows. >
I see shadows. Show a screenshot. > -Daniel has uploaded a folder, Where? Not in BZR. > which probably has the palette correct , > but looks more like Gnome-colors folder? maybe Andrew's folder could use > the same palate Daniel has used... Daniel's folder will not be used. I've said this many times. Once we switched that was it. Small fixes sure but his is a redesign. Andrew SB wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Cory K.<coryis...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So for now, I think the 0.50 release will be the one that makes Karmic. >> It's pretty solid (though i'm not sold on "computer" really) and >> bug-free. Any word on this Andrew? Is it through REVU? >> > > Yep, I uploaded it the day of the release. It's past the NEW queue and > is availiable in Karmic. > > https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/breathe-icon-theme > > and...@andrew-testing:~$ apt-cache policy breathe-icon-theme > breathe-icon-theme: > Installed: 0.50 > Candidate: 0.50 > Version table: > *** 0.50 0 > 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com karmic/universe Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > Ok. Killer. Admittedly, I haven't tested Karmic as much as I should. So, feedback from any adventurous souls is appreciated. @Andrew. Since we have moved to trunk for our packaging can you remove the packaging branch? I also think your packaging bug is hooked to that branch. I think since it's "Fixed-Released" it's ok if the link is broken. -Cory K. -- ubuntu-art mailing list ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
