sshfs doesn't resume file transfers if they break, but rsync does. P.S. Please don't top-post when all the other posts in the thread have been bottom posted. It makes the conversation hard to follow. I'm top-posting here merely to follow the change in flow that you have established here.
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you can also use sshfs and not need to split > > On Jan 6, 2008 12:45 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, "martin fricke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I want to split a 70GB backup into about 3GB segments so that I can > > > upload the entire backup to my web server. I only know of 7-Zip. Is > > > that the best option and what are is the best format and compression > > > settings for a backup? > > > > Believe it or not, you already knew the answer. There's a command > > called 'split' that does what you need. Here's a quick tutorial: > > > > http://www.newlinuxuser.com/split-a-large-file-into-several-smaller-files > >/ > > > > There's no need for archival/compression programmes :) > > > > The main question you should be asking, however, is why you need to split > > the file in the first place. If you're uploading using a tool like rsync, > > you shouldn't need to. -- "It seems clear that it will be very hard to increase browser marketshare on the merits of IE4 alone. It will be more important to leverage the OS asset to make people use IE instead of Navigator." - Microsoft Windows Product Manager Christian Wildfeuer, 1997-02-24
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- ubuntu-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
