Hi Scott, On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 00:15 +1000, Scott Evans wrote: > On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 00:04 +1000, Dave Hall wrote: > > I would suggest that we stick to the regular meeting cycle as proposed > > by Peter and in the intervening 3 weeks or so we try to develop some > > consensus around the issues, rather rush a meeting so issues can be > > railroaded. > > This my point ... a person (me) decides to use initiative and I get > stomped on for trying!
There is doing things properly and there is doing things badly. As someone who has a lot of experience of FOSS communities and community groups in general, I feel that I have some responsibility to point out when I feel that people are making mistakes. This was one of those occasions. > So as far as I'm concerned the meeting will go ahead as published... I don't think that is a very good idea if you want it to have much credibility. Cheers Dave -- ubuntu-au mailing list ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
