On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Tony "H.G" Candito <blindra...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:49 AM, peter baker <jellyw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> hey guys >> >> I humbly accept the nomination, this suggestion has been added to the wiki >> page for tonights meeting for team approval >> >> peter >> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Chris Chinchilla >> <ch...@chinchillamedia.com> wrote: >>> >>> I've come back to work on Monday morning to find a lot of emails... I've >>> got a bit lost trying to follow them all, but I'm keen to help out with an >>> Australian loco in a small way, basically, whenever a date is sorted out for >>> a meeting I'll try my best to attend and see what I can do... >>> >>> I know Peter well, if he has time and inclination, he has my vote to... >>> >>> >>> >>> On 16/05/2010, at 6:17 PM, Dave Hall wrote: >>> >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > I know some people on the list would like to see drastic actions being >>> > taken to change/fix/revive/whatever the LoCo. I think now is the time >>> > for cool heads and respectful discussion. >>> > >>> > I would propose that for the time being Melissa remain as team contact. >>> > I would also propose that Peter Baker (aka jellyware) become a co team >>> > contact (or whatever the title is). Peter's role would be to work with >>> > Melissa and the community to develop consensus around a new plan for the >>> > LoCo. >>> > >>> > I am proposing Peter as he has been around the LoCo for a long time. He >>> > is also a computerbank committee member, so he has some knowledge about >>> > how FOSS groups work. He has also been active around LUV and SFD, while >>> > also running ubuntu.net.au. In my experience Peter has always been a >>> > model of how to live by the code of conduct in the ubuntu community. >>> > Unless things have changed in the last 6 months or so, Peter is not a >>> > power user, but he is a passionate user of ubuntu. >>> > >>> > I think that Peter is the best person to bring the group together, while >>> > Melissa has the experience to stop us making the same mistakes again. I >>> > thin the 2 of them would make a great time to move us forward. Keep in >>> > mind this is an interim arrangement. >>> > >>> > I think the first role of the new team should be to facilitate a >>> > discussion on the direction and objectives of the group, to be followed >>> > by how to structure the group. >>> > >>> > Cheers >>> > >>> > Dave >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > ubuntu-au mailing list >>> > ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com >>> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ubuntu-au mailing list >>> ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au >> >> >> >> -- >> www.peter.id.au >> >> >> -- >> ubuntu-au mailing list >> ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au >> >> > > I also nominate peter for the roles outlined above. I'm not in > agreance with the other nomination, but since this, by very it's very > nature. seems to mean I (by default) am having a personal "attack" I > can do nothing but sit silently and agree. >
Ugh, 3 Freudian slips in one small sentence. Don't post before your morning coffee! -- ubuntu-au mailing list ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
