On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 20:13 +0800, Ryan Macnish wrote: > Ok, so i will leave the issue of the IRC structure alone, its clear > that some of the loco veterans dont want change, even for the benefit > of the loco. But also if i bring it up again i may get kicked from the > loco. > > > So now we have that sorted, i am agreeing not to bring up any more > issues about the loco that need discussing, because its evident that > some people in the loco are disturbed by this. So you will hear no > more complaints nor see any more action from me on this front.
I think the above email is a big part in why the team lost status, and it has set back the reinstate a long time. And it's not nisshh's fault, not one bit. > As for the social stuff, if everyone just announces meetings and > events on the social platform of their choice (be that facebook, > identica, diaspora or whatever) then people will re-tweet it and know > about it, so we may get more activity and participation. Even things > like Urban Terror and stuff should be announced. This is a great idea, it will attract more people, more energy, create more events, except the new people will hit the same wall nisshh hit and nothing will change. I would care except there are so many other really fun and vibrant open source related groups in Sydney (where I live) that aren't affiliated with a company. I believe other states are in a similar position, or could be soon. -- ubuntu-au mailing list ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au
