On Sat, Jan 29, 2011, John Dong wrote: > Indeed your intuition on not backporting python-defaults/python agrees > with mine. In cases like this, my recommendation is to make minimal > source changes necessary to linaro-image-tools to make it build > against lucid. Such source changes stand a much higher chance of being > accepted, and much lower risk of causing unwanted side effects to > other packages.
I'd like to keep the source identical between natty and lucid backport, which dh_python stuff can I assume will keep working? I could use dh_pysupport for instance, but will that go away? -- Loïc Minier -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports