On Sat, Jan 29, 2011, John Dong wrote:
> Indeed your intuition on not backporting python-defaults/python agrees
> with mine. In cases like this, my recommendation is to make minimal
> source changes necessary to linaro-image-tools to make it build
> against lucid. Such source changes stand a much higher chance of being
> accepted, and much lower risk of causing unwanted side effects to
> other packages.

 I'd like to keep the source identical between natty and lucid backport,
 which dh_python stuff can I assume will keep working?  I could use
 dh_pysupport for instance, but will that go away?

-- 
Loïc Minier

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports

Reply via email to