http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/FeatureList
Hi, Please check the date of the last edited time of the wiki page. Releases/9/FeatureList (last edited 2008-04-21 02:13:14 by JohnPoelstra<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnPoelstra>) . It was after releasing the preview release. A while ago Fedora released, we could not change the whole website yet. You don't even know about the differences between Fedora and Red Hat. You are talking about our Myths[1]. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraMyths On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:08 AM, raihan hasnain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How could you know? First install both Fedora 9 and Ubuntu 8.04 try to use > theme side by side for few days ... and if possible try Mint 5 beta and > opensolaris 2008.5 as well... then talk. > > I see you are "Fedora Ambassador for Bangladesh" meaning whatever I say > you'll hear blah blah blah. Still, for others I am sharing a piece of > information. > > Fedora Project is a Open Source project of "famous" RED HAT. Officially > Fedora is the open source (of RED HAT) movement but in real it is the crash > test dummy of RED HAT. Whatever gets stable and widely accepted by the users > goes into Red Hat Enterprise Linux with fully non-free support. Yes Fedora > will always give you the taste of latest technology, as it includes all > latest, unstable and test versions together. Check out this feature-list > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/FeatureList ... aren't all the > features look shiny comparing to any other OS? Of course yes. > > I am not biased to any Linux. I am more a fan of Linux Mint than Ubuntu > ... as it comes with all the features that a free OS can offer (with > non-free stuff). I personally promote Linux as an OS not any specific > distro. Having thousands of distributions it became a matter of choice for > the users. They must use whatever they like. > > Now if you make a novice user to use a distro which has all latest stuff, > but is unstable in many ways. Do you expect the user to be happy? [Fedora > lovers would say: WHY NOT!, Debian lovers would say: WTF! ] > > I have tried many distros (that inlcudes Red Hat 6, 7, 9, Fedora 2, 3 , > 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) and trust me, Ubuntu felt most comfortable (well actually > Mint 4.0, but it is entirely Ubuntu). > > > > > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Try to take everything positively. It's a news about, what people think > > about Fedora and Ubuntu. That's the reason to post it here. Nobody is > > arguing here. > > > > *P.S. 5 hours ago, F9 released, I guess, you didnt install it yet, when > > you was reading that article. So how could you know, nothing is new? First > > install it, then talk.* > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:02 AM, raihan hasnain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for sharing such a nice article. It was so informative that I > > > just formatted my Mac OS X 10.5.2 and installing Fedora 9 over it. The > > > article was so manipulating! > > > > > > > > > By the way this is the comment I have posted on that blog ... > > > > > > You gotta be kidding me! Why Ubuntu has to run for money? It is a free > > > > product :| > > > > > > > > All the features Fedora 9 included are already exist in other > > > > distros, so I couldn't find anything new. (I am using Ubuntu in flash > > > > drive > > > > for months). > > > > > > > > Can you explain why exactly Ubuntu has to run for money? The title > > > > seems interesting but totally lacks any sort of explanation. > > > > > > > > Canonical LTD. is dedicated to promote free software and is the > > > > official sponsor of Ubuntu. It is funded by Mark Shuttleworth, who is > > > > not a > > > > poor guy at all. Being a really nice distribution and having a HUGE > > > > community, I don't see any point of running out of money. > > > > > > > > May be you have some important points that I (we) don't know. > > > > Waiting for the reply. > > > > > > * > > > P.S. I didn't see a single point arguing that this or that is the > > > reason that is why Ubuntu is the competitor of Fedora (which is the > > > opposite > > > in real), therefore may I know the reason of mailing this worthless > > > article's link in a Ubuntu mailing list? Fedora 9 is released just few > > > hours > > > ago, and already people are claiming that **Fedora 9 "Gives" Ubuntu a > > > Run For Its Money. Pathetic!* > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2008/05/fedora-9-gives.html > > > > > > > > Digg It: > > > > > > > > http://digg.com/linux_unix/Fedora_9_Gives_Ubuntu_a_Run_For_Its_Money > > > > > > > > "Fedora 9 is a significant upgrade and packs in a number of new > > > > features. Perhaps the best part of Fedora 9 is the new live USB options. > > > > After playing with the release candidate for a week or so I am happy to > > > > report that Fedora 9 has made some significant strides and gives Ubuntu > > > > a > > > > serious run for its money when it comes ot user-friendliness. " > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Angel > > > > GPG key: 0xC4639705 > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AshiqurRahman > > > > > > > > -- > > > > ubuntu-bd mailing list > > > > ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com > > > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > ubuntu-bd mailing list > > > ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com > > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Angel > > GPG key: 0xC4639705 > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AshiqurRahman > > > > -- > > ubuntu-bd mailing list > > ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd > > > > > > -- > ubuntu-bd mailing list > ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd > > -- Angel GPG key: 0xC4639705 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AshiqurRahman
-- ubuntu-bd mailing list ubuntu-bd@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bd
