On 03/11/2011 01:29 PM, Brian Murray wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:00:00AM -0700, Charlie Kravetz wrote: >> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:04:34 -0500 >> David Tombs <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 03/11/2011 10:44 AM, Charlie Kravetz wrote: >>> >>>> As stated above, "Please list five or more bugs which >>>> you have triaged and include an explanation of your Triage." This really >>>> does state specifically that the bugs must be worked by the applicant, >>>> and not bugs they choose arbitrarily. It will be difficult to word this >>>> more clearly, the bugs _must_ be 5 bugs the individual has worked on. >>> >>> No, it's not explicit and not perfect, but I don't think it's worth >>> fixing. (As you say, it would be difficult and awkward.) How many people >>> have misunderstood this requirement? We can clear up rare >>> misunderstandings here on the list as we did in this case. >>> >>> Regards, >>> David >>> >> >> Please explain how "you have triaged" is not explicit. If you have not >> triaged those bugs, they don't count, do they? > > I might have said this before but the confusion may come from the fact > that the word triaged is confusing because it is a *process* and a bug > state. Additionally, a bug state that applicants to Ubuntu Bug Control > actually can't! > > So a phrase like 'five or more bug reports you have helped improve' > would avoid such confusion. Additionally, I'd rather sort this grammar > out on the wiki page in the event it is preventing people from applying.
I've made a few changes to <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl> in the hopes of clarifying this. Do you all think the changes are good enough to solve this issue? Thanks, David _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
