* Alberto Salvia Novella ([email protected]) wrote: > David Alan Gilbert: > >It's not really any more useful; 'inoperable state' isn't very > >well defined, and it doesn't really highlight the differences > >between: > > a) Permenantly damage (e.g. means machine will no longer get to BIOS > > which fortunately we see very very rarely) > > b) Requires reinstallation (it happens) > > c) Loses your data (rare, but it happens) > > d) Crashes regularly > > I called it "inoperable state" because what this state is, or other > variables are, don't matter compared with what part is affected: > > Critical: system or data. > High: main functionality. > Medium: secondary functionality. > Low: everything else. > > Even this is the case for frequency, what can be more accurately > figured out using Heat.
Note that the existing criteria give you other criteria; so for example 'low' says it's for bugs with an easy workaround. Now, I wouldn't generally knock something that caused a 'won't boot' or problem with a critical device down to low because it's got an easy work around, but I might knock it down one level. Dave -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

