David Alan Gilbert:
Note that the existing criteria give you other criteria; so for example 'low' says it's for bugs with an easy workaround.Now, I wouldn't generally knock something that caused a 'won't boot' or problem with a critical device down to low because it's got an easy work around, but I might knock it down one level.
While this in theory sounds logic; in practice I never had to use those criteria, because something else weighed more.
For example, my computer suddenly stopped working after an upgrade. The work-around was simply to configure GRUB to boot with a previous kernel, but because at least 80% of people would require technical support for doing so I decided to set it as critical.
So what I think is leaving specific cases for intuition rather to policy will make the latest leaner.
5S methodology: > Remove all parts not in use. If in doubt about anything, discard it. 5S methodology: > At first, it may be difficult to distinguish between what is > necessary and what is not. > In the beginning, get rid of items in the station work can be > disturbing. > People tend to surround themselves with pieces, thinking may be > necessary for "following orders". Come a machine that is > inappropriate and think that, anyway, will later be useful for > something.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
