That doesn't work either, Alberto. If there's not enough information to diagnose a bug, we should ask for that information and Incomplete the bug, not Invalid the bug.
The reason for the extra verbosity is to distinctively separate it from Incomplete, which states: Incomplete: * If you have to ask the reporter questions, set the report to Incomplete. * When you ask the reporter to provide any necessary information in a comment, ... ... As it currently stands, the Invalid rule supersedes that, which is NOT what should be done. Thomas On 07/20/2015 01:53 PM, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Thomas Ward: >> * The report does not contain adequate information to determine >> whether or not it is a bug, even if the issue is resolved for the >> reporter, and when either: > > >> * The reporter of the bug, upon requests for more information, >> does not provide the requested information, or > > >> * There is no way for the reporter to get additional information >> for the bug > > I would suggest to focus in clarity, rather than having all the > possible scenarios covered in the explanation. The point is to > distinguish between other statuses. > > For example, I would simply write something like "It isn't a bug or > there isn't enough information to solve it." > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
