The solutions presented here by Mozilla seems definitely better! I might have missed something important, so please correct me if I'm wrong. I wonder about the "non-free" status of the Firefox binary. As everyone said, considering the Ubuntu code, only free binaries have the right to be in the main repository. So what for Firefox?
I also wonder about the motivations of Mozilla to build a closed binary? Their web services really can't be opened? If I understood well, the AGPL licence is maid to ensure web services' openness. I don't know for you, but all this "non-free" stuff about Firefox strongly reminds me the XFree86 project that didn't want to hear the opinion of those "zealots". It ended, as you know it, with a far better project in many ways: Xorg. -- AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
