> >and that is with the same config file as it comes with edgy? >what was
> >bantime value option set to?
> it was set to -1. Yes it worked with the edgy conf file. I have not tested
> dapper conf with edgy fail2ban.
interesting
permanent banning was added in 0.6.1:
- Added permanent banning. Set banTime to a negative value to
enable this feature (-1 is perfect). Thanks to Mannone
so dapper version 0.6.0-3 is not intended to have that one
I checked dapper version and it has it set to 600, so you must have used
config from newer version (or changed manually) -- so it is not
fail2ban's fault :-P
> Ok i understand that. Why not trying to ake the last stable version of
> fail2ban and to make a deb file from it and to make some test on it
> after that. Maybe that is an option.
well - do you mean 0.6.2? I don't think that such a jump (from 0.6.0 to
0.6.2) would be ok... may be someone who knows ubuntu policies better
can correct me and do that for fail2ban...
in any case - I think that people should use 0.7.x branch of fail2ban
which probably would become stable very soon (and it is the one which is
present in Debian etch) -- it is better designed and organized.
> I hope I was not too hard in my speaking. ( If that the case sorry I
> didn't mean it.)
that is ok -- emails are bad as for describing emotions and intent so I
am trying to take them having positive intent as the base ;-)
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
--
dapper fail2ban 0.6.0-3 0 do not ban
https://launchpad.net/bugs/81408
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
