I'd rather suggest a boolean feature flag and then we use a custom scope
selector. The scope handler (project:?) could take a comma list of
project names.

That way we don't need custom flag parsing logic in the feature, and we
have a reusable feature scope!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777874

Title:
  If multiple reports on new bug, mark it confirmed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/777874/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to