On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Francis J. Lacoste <777...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I'd rather suggest a boolean feature flag and then we use a custom scope > selector.
+1 > The scope handler (project:?) could take a comma list of > project names. I'd start with (perhaps pillar:) taking just one name and use multiple rules to represent multiple things. Its what we've done for pageids etc, and I don't think we'll be overwhelmed with projects wanting it before we go full-on || option-in-project-config. > That way we don't need custom flag parsing logic in the feature, and we > have a reusable feature scope! \o/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777874 Title: If multiple reports on new bug, mark it confirmed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/777874/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
