@Tim, Ok, well I have tried my best to do the regressions potential section, although I understand that it may not be up to standards, but at least I found something to put in there.
** Description changed: [Impact] There are three patches in this one fix. So there are three bugs which are fixed: - Bug [1]: If the "Next" button ever gets set to "Sign In", it won't get reset to next until the next question asked by pam. - Bug [2]: Normally the user isn't allowed to proceed passed the username question until they've filled it in. To ensure this, the authprompt code desensitizes the next button when the number of characters change to zero. Unfortunately it fails to desensitize the next button up front when the entry starts out empty. - Bug [3]: Users are not allowed to cancel if the verification has not started yet and they are typing in their username. These are rather important things to be fixed as they make the login process more confusing and difficult. How the bugs are fixed: - Bug [1] fix: Reset "Next" button to "Next" when asking for username. - Bug [2] fix: Disallow the user to press "Next" when the username field is empty up front. - Bug [3] fix: authPrompt no longer ignores the request to cancel before a user has started verification and is still typing in their username. [Test Case] - Reproduce Bug [1]: On the first login screen (or log out - not lock), click "Sign In?", then before doing anything else click "Sign In", if the button allows you to press it and is not greyed out, then you have successfully reproduced this bug. - Reproduce Bug [2]: On the locked screen click "Sign In?", then before doing anything else press "Cancel". If nothing happens, you have successfully reproduced this bug. - Reproduce Bug [3]: On the locked screen click "Sign In?", then in the username field, start entering your username (or any text), then instead of pressing "Next", press "Cancel", if nothing happens then you have successfully reproduced this bug. + + [Regression potential] + + As these patches have already been put to practical use in the upstream + version, and the patches which have been put to use in this version, + have originated from those patches, I would say that the risk of + regression is minimal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479014 Title: "Cancel", "Next", and "Sign In" functioning incorrectly on login or locked screen in "Sign In?" section To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1479014/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs