I noticed this in .changes for libreoffice: - use internal libwps, opencollada, collada2gltf, libcmis, cppunit. Without looking any deeper just now, that feels very wrong. Either there should be more rationale as to why this was suddenly changed, or it's misdescribed (I see in changes merged from Debian changes in versions for some of these).
There's also mentions of disabling -evolution and -kde temporarily because parts they depended on were uninstallable in Debian -- they might not be uninstallable in Ubuntu. I think it would be better to double-check them and keep them available if they were already available in previous releases, since it would otherwise mean a regression for some users. Finally, is it normal for libreoffice and libreoffice-l10n to have exactly the same changelog? Even if they come from the same upstream source tarball, they appear to be two different source packages, and in the case of -l10n, at least some of the changelog entries wouldn't mean anything. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1491964 Title: [FFE] LibreOffice 5.0.x for wily To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1491964/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
