Hi Martin, I also ran an interdiff when I re-factored to ensure alignment with original fedora patches. 2 or 3 of them did not apply cleanly, for various reasons, so I had to make very small changes. I also named each patch in debian/patches to be same as in fedora.
For interdiff of openssl-1.0.2g-fips.patch, for some reason "Configure" shows up in diff yet I did not make any changes to patch. Visually compared to make sure code is the same and no regression. openssl-1.0.2a-fips-ec.patch, we do not ship a "version.map" file, so when applying patch it prompts for location of file... so I removed it. So will show up in diff. openssl-1.0.2a-fips-ctor.patch failed to apply altogether, because it is looking for a line of code that contains "secure_getenv" and not "getenv". upstream has "getenv" for that line of code, but fedora must have other patches applied before this one that changes it to "secure_getenv". So I corrected and this will show up in interdiff. Corrected Origin in all the patches from fedora. Hope this is all ok. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1553309 Title: [FFe]: Include FIPS 140-2 into openssl package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1553309/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
