Finishing Verification with @cpaelzer questions: I like your tests in #12 and #18, but can you think and compare several permutations of commits to non-active layers? Those should have worked before as far as I read the comments.
What would that be base->s1->s2->s3 and then committing s3 to s2 ? >> Demonstrated with 2, 3 and 4 snapshots ^^^^. Active can't be merged by all other layers can. At the end you will always have AT LEAST a base and the top layers (since the active can't be merged). What about inactive guests, would it work then? >> There is no way to merge volumes with inactive guests. It uses QEMU block jobs and it needs to be running. Move these tests, together with just the commands of #12 into the SRU Teamplate in the description then please. To ease the SRU Teams work. >> Doing right now. If you find any other invocation of block commit (e.g. to non active) that works today, list breaking that in regression potential please. >> All layers in RO mode (intermediate status). Will do. Considering this verified. Thank you Christian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317491 Title: virsh blockcommit hangs at 100% To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1317491/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
