** Description changed:

  We are running a long-running stunnel4 daemon to proxy TLS connections
  to another set of servers. After leaving it running for a few weeks, its
  memory usage had grown to 1.5GB. Restarting it reduced its memory usage
  to expected levels (VSZ and RSS) but while I've been watching it today
  it has grown by more than 10MB.
  
  The stunnel website indicates that there have been fixes relating to
  memory leaks in versions 5.32 and 5.33, but Ubuntu LTS is still running
  5.30.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: stunnel4 3:5.30-1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-45.66-generic 4.4.21
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-45-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.4
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Mon Jan  9 16:03:37 2017
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-10-31 (435 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 15.10 "Wily Werewolf" - Release i386 
(20151021)
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
+  TERM=xterm
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
  SourcePackage: stunnel4
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-05-18 (236 days ago)
  mtime.conffile..etc.default.stunnel4: 2016-10-26T22:22:28.166247
+ 
+ ===
+ 
+ [Impact]
+ 
+  * This bug results in a leak of TLS session objects in the stunnel4
+ server whenever a connection is closed. For a long running stunnel4
+ server, it can eventually consume all available memory.
+ 
+  * This bug was introduced in stunnel 5.27, and subsequently fixed in
+ 5.33. Ubuntu Xenial uses 5.30.
+ 
+  * For Ubuntu, only Xenial is currently impacted by this bug, as
+ previous versions of Ubuntu use an older version of stunnel4 (prior to
+ 5.27), and later versions of Ubuntu use a newer version of stunnel4 (at
+ least 5.33).
+ 
+  * This patch backports a single specific fix to free TLS session
+ objects when a connection is closed, but contains no other changes from
+ newer stunnel4 versions.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ 
+  * The bug and fix can be reproduced fairly easily by setting up an
+ stunnel4 server, then using openssl s_client to hammer against the
+ stunnel4 server. For example, with the server running on localhost port
+ 443, proxying to a local Apache instance, and using a client
+ certificate:
+ 
+ =
+ #!/bin/bash
+ while true; do
+   echo "" | openssl s_client -connect localhost:443 \
+     -cert /etc/stunnel/client.pem
+ done
+ =
+ 
+ In another window, monitor RSS of the stunnel4 server process with
+ something like:
+ 
+ =
+ watch 'ps -p $(</var/run/stunnel4/pid) -o rss,comm'
+ =
+ 
+  * The RSS of the stunnel4 process will continue to grow over time.
+ 
+  * After installing the patched version via my PPA[1] and re-running the
+ test, the RSS of the stunnel4 process will grow for a few minutes and
+ then reach a steady state where it no longer continues to grow.
+ 
+ [1] https://launchpad.net/~lscotte/+archive/ubuntu/stunnel4
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ 
+  * None expected. This backports a fix in newer versions of upstream
+ stunnel4.
+ 
+  * In my own environment, I've been running a production stunnel4 server
+ with my patch for over 85 days (zero restarts of the stunnel4 process).
+ With the current Xenial version I was unable to run for more than 1 day
+ without restarting stunnel4.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655153

Title:
  long-running stunnel leaks memory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stunnel4/+bug/1655153/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to