I expect so. I don't usually have a machine available to run as a server though, hence the preference for rsync.
If you're concerned that the NAS might be the bottleneck, don't be. That's a sensible point to raise, but it's GbE and saturates it wired. (To say nothing of the months during which the rsync consistenly hit 80+). If you think iperf might narrow the scope of where to look though, let me know and I'll try it next time I can dedicate a machine to it: shouldn't be more than a week. (hmm - I could run one up in a VM at will, which would still have more than enough network performance for this, but I'm not sure I'd fully trust the results from that until I've got a baseline to compare against. I'll try to remember it when I boot the client off an older kernel). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847892 Title: large performance regression (~30-40%) in wifi with 19.10 / 5.3 kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1847892/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
