Hello Christian, or anyone else affected,

Accepted systemd into disco-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/240-6ubuntu5.8
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from
verification-needed-disco to verification-done-disco. If it does not fix
the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag
to verification-failed-disco. In either case, without details of your
testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

** Description changed:

  [impact]
  
- due to recent change to run armhf tests in nested lxd container,
+ due to a recent change to allow armhf tests to run lxd containers,
  autopkgtest for systemd on disco fails consistently.
  
  [test case]
  
  see test results, linked in original description below.
  
  [regression potential]
  
  very low, autopkgtest fix only.
  
  [other info]
  
  original description:
  ---
  
  Since the recent few weeks systemd autopkgtest @ armhf @ disco fail [1].
  
  The log is very (very) long and partially interwoven due to concurrent 
execution.
  Somewhere in between we see this subcase is the one failing: root-unittests
  Of this test (which again has many subtests) it is: test-execute
  And of this again it is (always):
  
  I'll attach bad and good case full and stripped logs.
  
  The diff of those comes down to just:
  1. execute a find in a shell
  2. shell exits
  3. exec-dynamicuser-statedir.service: Main process exited, code=exited, 
status=0/SUCCESS
  vs
  3. exec-dynamicuser-statedir.service: Main process exited, code=exited, 
status=1/FAILURE
  4. in the bad case that triggers an assertion
  The find that fails is:
  
  find / -path /var/tmp -o -path /tmp -o -path /proc -o -path /dev/mqueue
  -o -path /dev/shm -o -path /sys/fs/bpf
  
  Good and bad case are the same most recent version
  systemd/240-6ubuntu5.7.
  
  Maybe something is bad in the containers we have for armhf in regard to these 
paths?
  Was there any change we'd know of?
  
  If there is nothing known, could we force-badtest it to get it out of
  the way of ongoing migrations?
  
  [1]: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/systemd/disco/armhf

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Disco)
       Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-disco

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845337

Title:
  Disco autopkgtest @ armhf fails root-unittests -> test-execute ->
  exec-dynamicuser-statedir.service

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1845337/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to