> Would it be ok to make a backport from plucky to oracular / noble?
yes, this is the plan. eusilsp was removed from Ubuntu just before the noble release due to misunderstanding, and was then synced again from the plucky. > Also remember running "update-maintainer", as suggested by Jeremy above. yes, I did run on my source tree. https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/euslisp/-/blob/master-24.04/debian/control#L4 > You should probably also update the bug description with some more detail from the SRU template: OK, updated. > Also please explain why exactly it was on sync-blacklist.txt and how it got removed again. I This is simply a confusion of ROS/Debain maintainers, and I claimed to remove it from the blacklist, see the conversation. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/euslisp/+bug/2096808/comments/8 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100570 Title: [SRU] upload euslisp/jskeus to Ubuntu/Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/euslisp/+bug/2100570/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
