On Thursday 30 March 2006 15:23, Eric Feliksik wrote: > You have a point there, but the explanation is not making things > complicated; it's only an acknowledgement of the fact that the *options* > are complicated.
The point is that there are too many options > That can be changed by either removing options (sleep, hibernate, > restart) which we don't want, or by splitting the stuff in sections. > Currently the division is "low impact on system" vs. "high impact". I'm > in favor of "pause session" vs. "end session" (which would put > hibernate/switch-user/lock in the first an reboot/shutdown/logout in the > last). > > Whatever the subdivision is, if the help-stuff is subtle (for example at > the bottom), the help-stuff itself does not complicate things. Help is not bad by nature *but* the point here is that having to show help is a symptom of bad design. A logout dialog should be simple enough to talk by itself. -- Jorge Bernal Ordovás <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Warp Networks S.L. http://warp.es/ || http://amedias.org/ -- ubuntu-desktop mailing list ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-desktop
