Hi Maybe i found a solution for this problem:
Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2007, 15:48 +0100 schrieb Ian Jackson: > Alexander Sack writes ("Re: Untrusted software and security click-through > warnings"): > > I completely agree. My point is: if captchas don't help then why would > > pasting commands from the net help to get the user think about the > > risk their actions imply? > > The point is pasting random commands from the net is inherently more > scary than saying `yes' a few times. > > Although we cannot save all of our users, we can save that proportion > of them who are likely to hesitate when a website says something like > "please type `wget thingy | sudo bash'". > > If you have a concrete suggestion for an approach which is likely to > save _in practice_ a greater proportion of our users, please do > suggest it. Users need more features than ubuntu is offering (uncommon hardware, non-ubuntu software). We would need several approaches: - Add more features to ubuntu. Stuff many people are looking for should be implemented first. A good list are pages like: http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Ubuntu:Feisty - If there are only a few people who need some commands to fix a problem, it would be possible to "sign" this commands by creating a small script and add this to the official repository. Afterwards the user has only to call "sudo apt-get solve_problem237" and "sudo solve237". The pages should only offer these commands as a help. Additional positive effect: Newbies can not botch. an own repository for this would be wise, I think Maybe this _could_ work. Thorsten -- Thorsten Sick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss