Reinhard Tartler spake thusly: > "Scott (angrykeyboarder)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> None that would "interest" [some Ubuntu] developers, I suppose.... >> >> OK... >> >> Off to plan B. >> >> getdeb.net >> >> Oh wait, Ubuntu developers get upset when users go elsewhere for updated >> versions of software... >> >> OK.. >> >> Off to plan C. >> >> ? > > Language, please. See please see http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct > for guidelines.
1. I don't see any foul language. Perhaps I'm overlooking something? 2. Considering the offensive nature of the message I was responding to, I feel I was quite reserved. In fact my response was (thankfully) written after a personal "timeout". > > You should have mentioned https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157642 in your > first message in this thread, so that developer can see the current > status about this issue. I beg your pardon, I *did* mention it. What are you seeing as the fist message in this thread? > ATM nobody seems to be assigned to it [1]. I'd > expect more people interested in the issue will subscribe and eventually > a developer will assign the bug to itself and do the SRU procedure. But > please stop this hostile tone on public mailing lists. I asked for help I got arrogance. Arrogance doesn't go over well with me. My apologies. You keep saying "public mailing lists". Is a "hostile tone" OK on private ones? ;) > > [1] well, I don't consider bugs assigned to a team as bugs assigned to a > specific person, but that's another issue. As I mentioned in the message (that's somehow fallen into a black hole here, yet can be found in it's entirety in the archive[1]) that *started* this thread my involvement began as a request (bug report) for a sync from Debian Sid. []1https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2007-November/002266.html > .....I requested a sync from Debian Sid (sid > currently has GIMP 2.4.1). My request was marked as a duplicate of the > following: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/baltix/+source/gimp/+bug/157642. > > The initial response to that bug was "THank you for your bug report. I'm > marking this as triaged." > > The bug was then quietly changed from "Triaged" to "Wishlist"(!). > > In my worst case scenario GIMP 2.4.x would eventually land in Gutsy > backports. In my best case scenario it would (more logically) land in > main and in the next week. > > It seems this has become a "back burner bug". > > How might I get it back to the "front burner" and how might I get GIMP > 2.4.x to land in a Gutsy updates or backports place within, say the > next week? > > Please note: > > I'm not a developer. > I'm not package maintainer. > I'm just an ordinary user. > > Thank you. -- Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com I've never used an OS I didn't (dis)like. ©2007 angrykeyboarder™ & Elmer Fudd. All Wites Wesewved -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
