On Dec 3, 2007 8:28 AM, Christofer C. Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2007 3:10 PM, (``-_-´´) -- Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I agree that : > > On Tuesday 23 October 2007 05:25:56 Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > > > This causes people to make useless comments of the form "This bug has > X > > > votes, why is it only Medium importance!", which causes more e-mail > > > notifications and slows down the developers further. > > > > but still this is a Comunity project, or is it not? > > If what users and comunity desire is not the important for the > "project", then what is? > > I think allowing the developers of the distribution, those who have a > real stake in the success of the software in its entirety, to decide > where to focus their efforts is superior to allowing the mob to decide > what's important. I also think that using straw-man arguments to make > your point is a mistake. I disagree. There needs to be some compromise between the developers and the mob, presuming that the mob consists of end-users. The end-user decides how much of a success the software is in its entirety. The developers need to keep that in mind at all times. regards Andrew
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
