Hi everyone! I will probably will stand out but I personally think that "random frame" is matter of taste. For me, it is much better than very badly looking covers, which they are for 80% movies. Only rare movies have pleasant, nice covers (I can say that from my expierence as very active movie watcher/imdb browser). So I would not haste on this decision.
Just my two cents, Peter. 2008/9/23 David Prieto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi again, > >> After that, one question of mine would be what happens when the >> internet connection goes away; does it fallback to Totem's >> thumbnailer, or do we get the ugly octet-stream icon? > > The creator of the software answered this: > > "the fallback system is very flexible. It should work also with Xubuntu. > It does something like this: > cover=$(wget etc...) > > If there is no connection wget should fail and if it fails there is no > cover, if there is no cover the fallback system is used. > > The fallback system checks first for gnome-video-thumbnailer, if it > doesn't exit it tries totem-video-thumbnailer (xubuntu I think), if that > one neither exist it checks for mplayer-video-thumb.sh" > > So yes, it falls back to totem's thumbnailer. > > > That aside, the author also asks one question and I would like to know > your opinion: > > "Do you want this to work for all videos by default? > Right now it only works for the paths specified in the config file but I > can change that, it should be very easy." > > > -- > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list > Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss > -- mortigi tempo Pēteris Krišjānis -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
