Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> We have not made any decisions about whether this program would be based
> on PackageKit, Add/Remove Applications, Synaptic, or something else, or
> written from scratch. We should first design what it will do and how it
> will behave, then work out how to implement it.
As you now doubt have heard numerous times already, if we could ever get to a
consistent interface between RPM / DEB based distros that would be a gigantic
win for Linux overall. For some extent I therefore think Canonical should have
at
least a small packagekit bias, should all the available options be _roughly_
equivalent.
I also have some feedback on the AppCenter spec (maybe there is something here
you'd
want to note even though I hope you will measure all such things in a proper UX
study).
The "new updates available" screen doesn't tell the user which ones are
critical/security
updates. While the file size of the update is nice to know, it's probably more
important
to have some icon that marks it as "really important". Windows update seems to
have both
but they emphasize the "update importance" and just write out the filesize as a
"FYI".
Popularity stats should not be skewed by "default installs" so I don't think it
should be based
straight on popcon (maybe it should be weighted against some list of default
installed apps
or something). Right now it looks like gnome games is more popular than for
example
freeciv/openarena/chromium which I have a hard time believing. Maybe more
people play
gnome games (because they are installed by default) but if I go into AppCenter
looking
for a cool new game that's very "popular", I'm probably looking for something
else.
I think the terms "Ubuntu Software" and "Partner Software" is a bit unclear. It
sounds
like the partner software is not Ubuntu software? I guess you are referring to
Canonical
Maintained apps but I don't have a better name for it.
Why is "Fonts" it's own top-level item next to "Ubuntu Software"?
I see that the "Description" field for each update is working properly in your
mockup.
I really hope that you will list that as a explicitly feature and make sure it
"just works".
Today update-manager has a feature where it shows a description for each update
but
that functionality very often just doesn't work. One could argue that
update-manager is
working properly and that it's the underlying infrastructure that doesn't work
as it
should (for instance "aptitude changelog BLAH" very often doesn't work either)
but the
end user doesn't care which app is broken and therefore I hope you will strech
outside
of this new AppCenter UI and fix the _experience_ that is actually delivered to
the end user.
Martin
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
