If we decide to go with this, who can make the final call, and how/where can it be announced?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:43, Asif Youssuff <yoa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 12:37 -0400, Danny Piccirillo wrote: > > Wait, I have a new proposal! Let's not include Empathy in Karmic, but > > plan on including it in Karmic +1 (and announce this) > > > > Why? Well, it will still give Empathy the attention it needs from > > developers to fix the bugs that would be considered regressions during > > the switch without actually replacing Pidgin before they're fixed. > > Aren't i brilliant? > > I much prefer this course of action -- it gets the testing it needs, but > we're not left holding the bag from feature regressions. For apps that > are included in the default install, we should be very conservative, imo > -- regressions are the most annoying aspect of /any/ upgrade. > > -Asif > > -- http://www.google.com/profiles/danny.piccirillo
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
