On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 16:51 -0400, Danny Piccirillo wrote: > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 16:37, David Schlesinger > <le...@access-company.com> wrote:
(...) > > > If you're not happy with the way the kernel project is being > run, I suggest > you'd do better to go talk to Linus and Andrew Morton about > it. > > If Ubuntu's governance is not to your liking, there are plenty > of other > distros. If none of those is to your liking, you can roll your > own. > > > The fact is that Linux is not entirely free, and there is a project > which is the Linux kernel without the nonfree bits. Talking about > linux governance is out of the scope of this discussion. Ubuntu's > philosophy says it is free, but even the free software only option has > nonfree bits. Why shouldn't i expect the mere option to have a fully > free system using Ubuntu? If you really believe such a kernel is needed shouldn't you gather some developers who share your view and provide a PPA with a (fully supported for all supported releases) libre-kernel independently from Ubuntu? The problem is, as I see it, that we don't have enough developers to prepare, test and supported such invasive changes that would be appreciate only by handful of people. -- Krzysztof Klimonda <kklimo...@ubuntu.com> -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss