On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 18:53, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote: > Once again: those are bugs. Let's just focus on solving the problem in the > existing kernel instead of adding another one. > > It's more difficult to segregate the non-free material so it can be provided > via the restricted repository for those that want it than it is just to rip > it all out, but that's the way to support both freedom of software and > freedom of choice. >
Agreed. My lingering question is, does this bug actually exist? I was under the impression that all the non-free parts were already removed when the "free-only" option was selected. -- Remco -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss