On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 18:53, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote:
> Once again:  those are bugs.  Let's just focus on solving the problem in the 
> existing kernel instead of adding another one.
>
> It's more difficult to segregate the non-free material so it can be provided 
> via the restricted repository for those that want it than it is just to rip 
> it all out,  but that's the way to support both freedom of software and 
> freedom of choice.
>

Agreed. My lingering question is, does this bug actually exist? I was
under the impression that all the non-free parts were already removed
when the "free-only" option was selected.

-- 
Remco

-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Reply via email to