On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 19:10, Remco <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 18:53, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: >> Once again: those are bugs. Let's just focus on solving the problem in the >> existing kernel instead of adding another one. >> >> It's more difficult to segregate the non-free material so it can be provided >> via the restricted repository for those that want it than it is just to rip >> it all out, but that's the way to support both freedom of software and >> freedom of choice. >> > > Agreed. My lingering question is, does this bug actually exist? I was > under the impression that all the non-free parts were already removed > when the "free-only" option was selected.
Debian, for example, separates the firmware into a free and a non-free variant: http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=firmware-linux Ubuntu does not use those package names. Where did the firmware end up in Ubuntu? -- Remco -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
