On 02/05/2013 07:45 PM, Ryan Tandy wrote:
John Moser <john.r.moser <at> gmail.com> writes:
2. Convince Ubuntu to put the newest Puppetmaster in Backports. I am
not advocating this either.
Slightly off-topic, but FWIW I would be happy to see raring's puppet
(whatever version that ends up being) in precise-backports.
lucid-backports has puppet 2.7 and that made my life a LOT easier since
my puppetmaster runs precise and I am using some recent modules. Having
backports available but not installed by default is really quite nice.
Furthermore it's quite likely that at some point I'll have some clients
running a newer Ubuntu than the puppetmaster, and it would be great to
be able to support it just by upgrading puppetmaster to a backports
version.
http://apt.puppetlabs.com/
While we're at it, why is etckeeper stuff in the package? The
Puppetlabs guys said because it's in Debian's package and "Debian
packagers are fruitbats", so they're imitating "for compatibility."
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
