I am working with the list admins to get this removed. Michael Hall mhall...@ubuntu.com
On 11/05/2014 01:17 PM, M.hanny sabbagh wrote: > Now that's not very diplomatic, i didn't expect to see this sort of > conversations on a developers list, specially those about open source > software. > > Too bad to see that.. in here.. > > News will talk about this. > >> From: castleofwh...@mail.com >> To: john.r.mo...@gmail.com >> Subject: Re: A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is. >> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 19:13:54 +0100 >> CC: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com >> >> Nope. Fuck you. >> It was good enough for us then and it's good enough for us now. >> You can use this media with any GPL program or other GPL media. >> Go and fuck yourself. >> (and hey, it's dual licensed under CC BY SA anyway if you're a > homosexual who is anal) >> >> The Law is all about appeals to authority, dumbass. >> >> It's my fucking song and I can distribute it as I like, and I say the > GPL is the license. >> You can certainly use it and modify it and do anything you could do > with a GPL program. >> YOU cannot tell ME what I decide for MY FUCKING SONGS YOU PIECE OF SHIT. >> >> FUCK YOU YOU DAMNED PRO FEMINIST FUCK. >> And Fuck SystemD. >> >> >> My Copyright protected work, MY LICENSING DECISION. >> And I have decided GPL. It has always worked and is proven. >> And if you continue to keep saying I have licensed it less permissably. >> >> Well then that's libel and I hope to see you in an alleyway, because > you're spreading lies about me. >> Shut your fucking mouth. >> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 at 6:07 PM >> From: "John Moser" <john.r.mo...@gmail.com> >> To: "Castle OfWhite" <castleofwh...@mail.com>, > ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com >> Subject: Re: A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is. >> On 11/05/2014 01:01 PM, Castle OfWhite wrote: >> > It's licensed elsewhere under CC-BY-SA aswell, just for such an > occasion. >> > The GPL is a fine media license when said media is a part of a program >> > (game etc). In such cases Judges usually see the entire thing as a whole >> > rather than a collection of parts. >> > >> >> That's a weak argument. It's an appeal to authority and to tradition. >> >> The GPL directly describes considerations for linking and source code, >> as well as program executable modules. While it makes some sense to >> include resources in the definition of the program in general, >> extracting the media from the program immediately creates confusion >> about what exactly was violated; the only proper interpretation is that >> distributing the media with the program is allowed, while the media >> without being part of the program is not under any permissive license >> and, thus, distributing it is a copyright violation. >> >> > I do know what I'm doing, and You show your ignorance :). >> > I've been writing programs and making free/opensource media >> > from before the CC license were created. >> > >> > Back then we just licensed our stuff under the GPL, the BSD license, or >> > the gnu FDL. (or all of them) Worked fine. People understood. >> > >> > SO FUCK YOU! >> > >> > Go fuck yourself you pro-feminist pro-systemd piece of shit. >> > (I remeber when there weren't feminists in free/opensource too) >> > (nor better-than-thou systemd loving assholes) >> > >> > I hope Mr Cook is edged out because he supports your beliefs >> > (and that is leading to a ban in russia of apple products) >> > You people need to be fought back against. You've ruined the >> > world for regular men. >> > >> >> Okay, civilized conversation has broken down. >> >> >> >> On 11/05/2014 12:27 PM, Chateau DuBlanc wrote: >> >>> A Jumble of Lines - Because that's what systemD is. >> >>> "More code .: better" >> >>> >> >>> youtu.be/ACDi1YOcupk >> >>> >> >>> SystemD introduces (further) systemic vulnerabilities into Gnu/Linux. >> >>> Here is a song feeling that situation out. >> >>> >> >> >> >> Take this immaturity elsewhere. I thought I was being spammed by >> >> YouTube again. >> >> >> >>> (C) Gnu GPL v2 >> >>> >> >> >> >> GPL is not an appropriate media license; it is a license for source >> >> code. This usage shows you like to make statements about things you >> >> don't understand; thus your assessments of systemd are immediately >> >> suspect, and readily assumed misguided. >> >> >> >> In other words: you obviously don't know what you're talking about, and >> >> your input on any matter is valueless. >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list >> Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss > > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
