#<domain> <type> <item> <value> @foo soft nproc 20 @foo hard nproc 50
Every user who is _not_ in the group "foo", simply is _not_ in this group, it makes completely no sense to introduce a negation of being in a group, since the negation is already not being member of this group. [foo@linux ~]$ id foo uid=1000(foo) gid=1000(foo) groups=1000(foo) [foo@linux ~]$ id bar uid=1001(bar) gid=1001(bar) groups=1001(bar),1000(foo) [foo@linux ~]$ id jane_doe uid=1002(jane_doe) gid=1002(jane_doe) groups=1002(jane_doe) What would you gain by introducing a negation of being in a group? You only would lose clarity? You could set up a new group, if nobody should be in the group "foo", but the user "foo". #<domain> <type> <item> <value> @npgroup soft nproc 20 @npgroup hard nproc 50 [foo@linux ~]$ id foo uid=1000(foo) gid=1000(foo) groups=1000(foo),50(npgroup) [foo@linux ~]$ id bar uid=1001(bar) gid=1001(bar) groups=1001(bar),50(npgroup) [foo@linux ~]$ id jane_doe uid=1002(jane_doe) gid=1002(jane_doe) groups=1002(jane_doe) -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
