On Sun, 3 Jul 2016 15:18:44 -0500, Kaosu NA wrote: >Not only will something like this be more user-friendly, but it >also allows a large number of Ubuntu users to take advantage of a >modern security technology without giving up usability.
Secure boot is modern, but it is useful for Linux and BSD users? Most user-friendly still is to disable secure boot, isn't it? What are the benefits of secure boot for Linux and BSD users, who don't have a dual or multi boot with a Windows install, that requires it? I'm neither using SELinux, nor AppArmor or anything else. Isn't AppArmor part of default Linux install? Isn't this enough additional security? -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
