On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:15 AM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 03:39:48 -0400, Tom H wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >>> >>> It's still more user-friendly to disable secure boot, than to deal >>> with it, isn't it? >> >> It's certainly simpler. I've disabled SB on my laptop out of sheer >> laziness > > I only use an old BIOS computers, but assumed one day I should get an > UEFI-secure-boot computer, then I most likely would disable secure > boot. Call it "laziness", I name it "cautiousness to avoid trouble".
In my case, it's just laziness. I'm not currently using SB on my own laptop because I use upstream kernels but I'm doing so on four laptops; they single-boot Ubuntu with its default SB setup without a problem. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss