> On Jan 30, 2026, at 2:52 PM, Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 4:46 PM Philip Semanchuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Apologies if this isn’t the right place for this message. I’m the author and 
> maintainer of sysv_ipc (https://github.com/osvenskan/sysv_ipc/) which appears 
> in Ubuntu as the package python3-sysv-ipc. I noticed that the Ubuntu version 
> is using 1.0.0, which is not ideal because it contains a memory leak that was 
> fixed in v1.0.1. 
> 
> I’ve just released version 1.2.0 which brought the project up to modern 
> Python standards. Maybe that will make it easier for you to (re)package? 
> 
> Please contact me if I can help get a more current version into Ubuntu’s 
> package repositories.
> 
> You should probably file a bug report with Debian.  I think that would be the 
> quickest way to get the package updated in Debian and all its derivatives.
> 
> It looks like Debian is still packaging 1.1.0: 
> <https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=python3-sysv-ipc>.  You can 
> contact the Debian maintainers -- it is Debian's OpenStack team 
> <[email protected]>.  See 
> <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?dist=unstable;package=python-sysv-ipc>.

Hi Jeff,
Thanks. Version 1.1.0 is solid and can continue to be used for a long time. 
Version 1.2.0 contains mostly packaging improvements and modernizations. I 
think Linux repository maintainers might find 1.2.0 easier to (re)package, but 
if they’ve already got a working version packaged then there’s not a lot of 
pressure for them to update.

But from the link you sent I can see that bookworm and bullseye (oldstable and 
oldoldstable) are using 1.0.0. I’ll contact the maintainers.

Cheers
Philip 


-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Reply via email to