(I know I'm very late to this discussion, but want to make sure this is clarified)
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 03:27:29PM -0600, Duncan McGreggor wrote: > Let me break that down for easy viewing: > * Application Developers > * Application Selection and Defaults > * Cloud > * Development Process > * Hardware Compatibility > * Other > * Ubuntu the Project > > We had 9 tracks last year and filled them pretty well. We're looking at > at 2 less this year (as defined above) and probably even more sessions > than last time (every year our material has grown). If you missed it, you might want to review http://mdzlog.alcor.net/2010/05/27/rethinking-the-ubuntu-developer-summit/ for some rationale for updating the format. We haven't added or subtracted tracks; we've arranged them on a different axis. Sessions are now listed by topic, rather than by which team happened to submit them. > Unless we're cutting out slots and pushing outlying session topics into > the community for discussions instead of proper UDS sessions... We do not "push topics into the community", because we are part of the community. UDS is a community event, and all of the sessions at UDS are "proper", whether they come from a Canonical engineering team like yours or an individual with a passionate interest in the subject. -- - mdz -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel