On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:44:24PM +0000, Shane Fagan wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:38 -0800, Rick Spencer wrote: > > Does "/opt/ubuntu/" perhaps suggest a bit of "officialness" or support > > from the Ubuntu community, whereas these apps are specifically *not* > > suppose to have such a connotation? > > Yeah I get what Rick is saying here. Does using /opt/ubuntu imply that > these apps are officially supported in some capacity? I think it does a > little, id say /opt/extra is a better option.
We don't own the /opt namespace, so "extra" is far too general. See http://www.lanana.org/lsbreg/providers/providers.txt for the kinds of names that are suitable there. "ubuntu-extras" would be fine, I imagine, and connotes exactly as much support as "extras.ubuntu.com" does. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
