Am Dienstag, den 08.03.2011, 10:07 -0500 schrieb Andrew Starr-Bochicchio: > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:42 AM, James Westby <jw+deb...@jameswestby.net> > wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:56:19 -0800, Steve Langasek > > <steve.langa...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > >> Maybe 'bzr debrelease', to avoid polluting the namespace too much? > >> > >> This should be implemented on top of 'dch' and support the -D option to > >> specify an upload target; we definitely shouldn't have bzr-builddeb > >> encoding > >> its own notion of the default upload target, it's bad enough to have *one* > >> package that doesn't get updated for this as part of the release. :) > > > > Too late, sorry :-) > > > > I wonder if it would be possible to use dch for all the places this > > information is currently needed. > > I wonder what ever happened to bdrung's efforts to get a release-info > script in the archive? I haven't heard anything about this in a while, > but though it was a great idea. Having to update this info in only one > package would be ideal.
I renamed it to distro-info and integrated into ubuntu-dev-tools. You can play with distro-info, ubuntu-distro-info, and debian-distro-info in natty. My plan is to move these scripts from ubuntu-dev-tools to devscripts (and let dch use them). -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
