On Jun 03, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >On Friday, June 03, 2011 11:18:34 AM Barry Warsaw wrote: >> On Jun 03, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >I'm not sure how complete the current draft is relative to the planned >> >content coverage but so far it lacks a lot of information that was in the >> >old wiki pages that I found useful when trying to use IDD. >> >> I might be misunderstanding, but do you mean some information that was in >> the UDD wiki pages didn't make it into the UPG? I thought I was pretty >> careful about making sure everything got transferred over. It's possible >> that the information is organized differently (and maybe not optimally), >> but please do let me know if you think any of the fundamental information >> didn't make it over. > >I didn't find the what to do after you upload bits since the current stuff is >oriented towards new users. I may have just missed the relevant topic though.
Yep, I think so, but to be fair, it's probably not very well organized for experienced users. http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/packaging-guide/html/udd-uploading.html Essentially you just need to: $ bzr mark-uploaded $ bzr push ubuntu:package (sometimes just `parent:` will work) Cheers, -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
